A short resume:
The Canadian woman was one of my fans on YouTube. She often made
nice and flattering comments on my videos. We began talking on Skype
during the winter of 2007. (Skype is a chat program that you can use
like a free telephone.)
One of my kittens, (N)Ridanos Dansing, born in the fall 2007 was
damaged at birth by a tangled umbilical cord and lost a hind leg.
This kitten was very popular on YouTube and everyone wanted it.
Another kitten in the same litter (N)Ridanos Desdemona, was also
damaged at birth. The Canadian woman's sister in law, who was
starting a cattery, wanted to buy Desdemona.
The Canadian woman came to Norway on the 20th of February 2008.
During her stay, we agreed that, in addition to Dansing and
Desdemona, she would also take (N) Ridanos Fandango back to Canada.
Her sister in law was interested in him and we agreed that anything
over $1,300.00 CAD (7000 NOK) she could keep.
During her stay the Canadian woman tried to buy something with her
bank card. Her bank card was rejected because she had a grand total
of $0.66 on her account. She contacted both her employers. I was
astounded that they did absolutely nothing to help a destitute
employee on another continent! I felt sorry for the Canadian woman
and wanted to help her. Therefore during her visit we also agreed
that I would later ship four more Bengal kittens to Canada which she
and her sister in law would either buy or sell to third persons. We
would share the costs and any eventual profits. The Canadian woman
expected to be able to sell each kitten for approximately $3,000.00
CAD.
The Canadian woman returned to Canada with the
three kittens on the 02nd of March and sold Fandango to her sister
in law. The Canadian woman transferred ~$1,300.00 to me.
On the 26th of March the four
kittens (N)Ridanos
Eros, Einstein, Ernest and Erik arrived in Canada.
Digital photos of the
pedigrees, and other
documents were also sent to Canada.
The original pedigrees and
transfer of ownership documents for the four kittens are here in
Norway waiting for the addresses of the new Canadian owners.
The
Canadian woman's sister in law kept Ernest and Einstein at her home
while the Canadian woman had Eros and Eric and at least five other
cats in her apartment. The Canadian woman paid for ads in the
newspaper.
Her sister in law and her brother paid for ads in the Toronto
weekend paper to sell the kittens.
In May the Canadian woman
claimed she had difficulty selling the kittens and some of them were
getting skittish. She was considering castrating them because they
were getting older and
it would be very difficult for her to have so many
un-neutered male cats in her small apartment.
On the 10th of June I received
a
complaint from a buyer, that the Canadian woman and her sister
in law often refer to as "that crazy bitch". I prefer to call her
"Martha". The Canadian woman had sold her a kitten for $500.00 and
refused to honor a written guarantee
that clearly stated that the kitten could be returned for “any
reason” and the money would be refunded. When Martha went to the
Canadian woman's apartment to pick up Eros, she was so appalled by
the conditions there and her concern for the cats living there, that
she filed a complaint with the Humane Society.
The Canadian woman's mail
correspondence with this person contains remarks like
- "You
are talking out your ass and don't have a clue."
- and
-
“I can tell that I was
right about you, you are going to stomp your feet and have a
tantrum, aren't you princess?".
Martha was not informed
that the documents, including the pedigree, were not originals, but
made from digital photos. In addition, Martha was not informed
by the Canadian woman that the kitten had recently been treated for
Feline Chlamydophila! The veterinary certificate from Norway
stating, in English, that the kittens were treated for Feline
Chlamydophila and were responding positive to treatment were not
included. Even though the kitten had apparently responded positive
to treatment it is irresponsible to not inform the buyer of this.
I
published a video on YouTube of an attractive Danish woman in a café
with me. After publishing that video, The Canadian woman has refused
to answer my inquiries about the complaint, the whereabouts of the
other three kittens, or about my share of the profit.
I have demanded three things of
the Canadian woman.
1. That she contacts the buyer,
Martha, honor the written guarantee
and make a payment plan to
pay back the $500 owed. Martha bought the kitten on a Friday
afternoon 6th of June and attempted to return the kitten Sunday in
accordance with the written guarantee.
Cf. "If for any reason you wish to bring him back full refund will
be given."
2. That she provides me with
information as to the whereabouts and status of the other three
kittens. Have the buyers of the other three kittens been treated
like the Canadian women and her sister in Law treated Martha?
3. The Canadian woman must make
some sort of fair and reasonable payment plan to pay me what she
owes me.
Her response to my demands has
been criminal blackmail!
Email dated 02.08.2008 18:01
RE: Hi
- "Your crazy obsessive
behavior will get you into trouble! You should talk this all out
with your doctor. Seek help.
If you make even a small ripple in
my pond, I will hit you where it will hurt! Your Wallet/You
Tube.
Did you forget? I know you have not been claiming your cat
money. I will tell the government and Davids Mother.
I know you are not going to listen to me and move on. You
enjoy your obsessions, they are your life!"
Email dated 03.08.2008
08:22
RE: Hi
YouTube
Channel
Comments
RidanosBengalsZone
mulelover | 02
August 2008
"There are
two sides to this. I am guessing that you don't care to hear
the other. That's ok the
people who have been told will be intouch with Richard. The
government doesn't like when you don't pay them and the
child support owed."
The sister in law's
disturbing role
When the Canadian woman
started her criminal blackmail, took steps to disrupt my family and
private life and damage my relationship with my son, I was puzzled
by her sister in law's apparent lack of disapproval.
I also found the
following very disturbing. The Canadian woman’s sister in law writes
in an email dated August 4, 2008 to Martha:
"The Canadian woman
denies giving you any
signed document stating "any
reason" so i don't know about that".
When that very
signed document is published on
my web page, proving the Canadian woman was lying, her sister in law
is still willing to provide unconditional support to her! The sister
in law, a member of: The Canadian Cat Association, The International
Cat Association, The International Bengal Cat Society, The Bengal
Cat Connection and member of a local cat club, has not a hint of
scruples about joining her sister in law in the intimidation and
public ridicule of Martha.
More about her sister
in law's involvement with the
deplorable circumstances
regarding the sale of the kitten Eros.
The sister in law's
involvement in the sale of these 4 kittens is more than casual.
Two of
the kittens were kept at the sister in law’s home. She paid for
advertisements in newspapers to sell the kittens.
For example an
entry in the Skype chat log suggests her
sister in law will get a share of the profit. The
Canadian woman and I discussed orally several times that her sister
in law was of course entitled to her share of the profit if she sold
a kitten.
It has been claimed
several times that my issue is only with the Canadian woman and NOT
the sister in law whom is responsible for the cattery. The Canadian
woman has nothing to do with her sister in laws cattery and is not a
member of the cat club.
The Canadian woman aka
mulelover functions as a spokesperson for her sister in law's
cattery.
mulelover
“Richard, we have our
shit. But (name of sister in laws 16 year old
daughter’s YouTube channel removed) bought Desdemona and Fandango from you to
start her own cattery. You better make sure you fix this and I mean
in the morning tomorrow. She has been nothing but nice to you. If
you screw her, you are exactley what you accused me of being.”
(name
of sister in laws 16 year old daughter’s YouTube channel removed)
is the
account the sister in law uses. It belongs to her 16 year old
daughter.)
In the following
example the person "feyhra" directs a question to
(name of sister in laws 16 year old daughter’s
YouTube channel removed) (her
sister in law) and asks where her sister in law is registered as a
breeder and the name of her cattery. Again The Canadian woman is the
spokesperson for her sister in law's cattery.
feyhra
“(name
of sister in laws 16 year old daughter’s YouTube channel removed)
- hello
there.. i feel awkward butting in here where tempers are so frayed(i
hope it all gets resolved soon!), but i couldn't help noticing you
are a breeder of bengal cats and i have a have a friend who is
interested in purchasing a kitten. do you have a website, or can you
indicate where you are registered as a breeder, or the name of your
cattery, so she can get in touch with you? i took a little look
around the web but i couldn't find you.. many thanks. hope you can
help”
mulelover answers the
following on behalf of her sister in laws cattery:
“lol sorry dear I don't
think (name of sister in laws 16 year old
daughter’s YouTube channel removed) will be busting out any personal info on this public
forum. She is not stupid.”
The sister in law
obviously condones the Canadian woman's roll as spokesperson in the
following:
(name
of sister in laws 16 year old daughter’s YouTube channel removed)
“Geez Richard look
who's talking--you have so many bogus accounts it's not
funny--anyway, i'm only here tonite to let you know, since you won't
answer the phone to --big surprise--that i have contacted everyone
and complained--Red Herring? Nice try --the proof is in the
emails/bills/receipts--thanks for the bullsh*t RN--anyone
wants proof feel free to contact us or ML”
(ML
is Mulelover aka The Canadian woman)
In other instances The
Canadian woman takes on the roll of thug or gangster for her sister
in law's cattery.
mulelover
“Do we have to make
videos about it as proof. Even Neil of the Ridanos Bengal Zone was
excited about maybe buying a Ridanos Canadian kitten. Everyone read
comments about it on your videos.
Don't you dare fucking LIE. FIX IT.”
The Canadian woman has
several times corresponded with the Norwegian cat association NRR
and the FIFe Disciplinary Commission
ON BEHALF OF HER
SISTER IN LAW REBECCA’S CATTERY! That certainly makes her an
intrinsic part of her sister in law's cattery.
Links to that correspondence are under construction.
Conclusion
The Canadian woman is
such an integral part of her sister in law's cattery (and family)
that I consider her sister in law as an accomplice in the theft of
these kittens, blackmail and harassment.
Important
notice
