Many of
the Canadian woman’s claims in her e-mail "The whole story..." are
impossible or extremely unlikely.
For
example, the
Canadian woman writes the
following about (N)Ridanos Dansing who had only 3 feet.
“Unfortunately
the Mother had eaten it and some of his sisters toes and Richard
told me he was going to have them put down if he couldn't find
someone who wanted them.”
She is
apparently trying to insinuate that my cats get so little food that
they must resort to cannibalism.
Does
this make since? The mother chewing of just the hind leg on one
kitten, the toes on another and then decided her hunger was
satisfied! This would leave open and excruciatingly painful soars on
both kittens. It is doubtful that these two kittens would ever
survive such an injury for very long. How would a Veterinarian be
pretty much required by Norwegian animal welfare laws to deal with
such an excruciatingly painful injury on two small kittens? There
are two videos of these kittens in contact with a Veterinarian.
“Kittens Visit The Vet” 16.Jan.2008 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRWkFKtIyN8
and «At the Vet!» 26. Feb 2008
http://www.livevideo.com/video/RichardNorton/D9154BBD4DE5488DB9C8349FBFE8FE7A/at-the-vet-.aspx
I also
have unpublished video of visits to the Vet.
What
really happened was the leg and foot of two kittens got tangled in
the umbilical cord. This cut off blood circulation, the leg then
dries up and eventually falls off. Accidents like this are not
uncommon. The Canadian woman is a chronic liar.
The
Canadian woman repeatedly claims that she rescued these kittens
because I was going to “have them put down”. None of the other
persons I offered these kittens to was told that they would be put
down. There would be absolutely no problem finding a home in my
neaborhood for those kittens. After all did not the Canadian woman
come all the way to Norway to “save” the little kitten? (Or did she
come for an entirely different reason?)